Child Safeguarding Report
A new report by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel highlights that the safeguarding system needs to do more to protect teenagers and infants from abuse and neglect.
The independent panel of experts reviews serious child safeguarding incidents, when children have died or suffered serious harm, to learn how to improve the system.
Since the panel was established in July 2018, it's received over 500 serious safeguarding notifications. Over 230 of these involved children who tragically died.
The panel's annual report shows that teenagers and infants appear more at risk of serious harm in the context of abuse and neglect with almost 30 per cent of cases involving babies under 12 months old. While teenagers fall prey to harm from criminal gangs, babies are most often harmed or killed by parents or their partners.
At least half of all children who died or were seriously harmed were already identified as vulnerable. Despite that identification, the system was not able to prevent the death or serious incident. Weak risk assessment and poor decision making were identified as major themes within these cases.
That's why the panel is asking for government departments to align current and enhanced investment and strategies for vulnerable children across health, education, policing and social care. This will help people who safeguard children to work together more effectively.
Karen Manners, on behalf of the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel, said:
Our panel reviews the most serious incidents of child abuse and neglect so we can learn how to improve the safeguarding system.
Our first annual report shows that babies and teenagers are most at risk of serious harm. And, while most safeguarding partners are successfully promoting children's welfare, it's hard for them to achieve the highest standards without more support.
Government must ensure investments to help vulnerable children are aligned, so everyone who works with children can provide the coordinated and consistent support every child deserves.
Acting on these findings, the panel's first in-depth review looks at the significant number of notifications regarding teenagers coerced into knife crime, and drug trafficking, by criminal gangs.
The review titled, 'It was hard to escape', examines the lives of 21 teenagers from 17 areas across the country. It aims to understand if the services designed to keep young people safe from criminal exploitation are working.
The findings show:
- boys from black and ethnic minority backgrounds appear more vulnerable to being coerced into lives of crime
- moving children away from the local area isn't an effective long-term solution to protect them from the reach of criminal gangs
- exclusion from mainstream school can escalate the risk of manipulation by criminal networks
The review also visited local areas developing innovative solutions to tackle criminal exploitation, such as Manchester's Safeguarding Partnership. These pockets of emerging good practice demonstrate the need for more investment to replicate effective multi-agency interventions across the country.
The review 'It was hard to escape' makes the following recommendations for the Home Office, Department for Education, Department of Health and Ministry of Justice:
funding trials of a new practice framework, which can respond to children at risk of serious harm from criminal exploitation
reviewing the current Government guidance Working together to safeguard children, to ensure that it better reflects potential harm from criminal networks
reviewing whether the National Referral Mechanism, which is used to protect children vulnerable to modern slavery, is an effective tool to help young people who are being criminally exploited
collecting systematic data about children who are being criminally exploited so it's possible to accurately assess the size of the problem
In addition to the in-depth review into the criminal exploitation of adolescents, the panel is undertaking further in-depth reviews into sudden unexpected deaths and non-accidental injuries of infants under one year old. These reviews will be published later this year.
Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel
Department for Education
Great Smith Street